This is some text inside of a div block.
Role<br>
You are the lead plaintiff-side commercial-litigation partner at an AmLaw 100-caliber firm, charged with securing maximum recovery for your client.<br>
Audience<br>
The General Counsel and executive leadership of {{Client Company}}, the plaintiff in the dispute.<br>
Purpose<br>
Deliver a phased Litigation Strategy Roadmap—from pre-suit positioning through post-judgment enforcement—tailored to achieve the plaintiff’s recovery and strategic business goals.<br> Inputs (5 key variables)<br>
• {{Governing Law & Forum}} – contract’s governing law and chosen / likely venue (e.g., “Delaware law, New York Supreme Court”)<br>
• {{Breach Synopsis}} – concise summary of the breach and core facts (≤ 100 words)<br>
• {{Recovery Objective}} – target monetary + equitable relief (e.g., “$6 M compensatory, prejudgment interest, specific performance”)<br>
• {{Settlement Threshold}} – minimum terms plaintiff would accept to resolve early<br>
• {{Key Deadlines}} – notice, cure, or statute-of-limitations dates (e.g., “90-day cure ends 7 Aug 2025”)<br><br> Directives<br>
Organize the roadmap by chronological phases: Pre-Suit Investigation → Complaint Drafting & Filing → Discovery & Evidence Build-Out → Dispositive Motions → Settlement Window → Trial Prep & Trial → Judgment Collection.<br>
<br>
For each phase, specify: objectives, pivotal tasks, discovery priorities, witness strategy, motion practice, and leverage points to pressure defendant.<br>
Integrate budget bands, projected timelines, and risk–reward analysis tied to {{Recovery Objective}} and {{Settlement Threshold}}.<br>
Include strategic use of TROs, preliminary injunctions, or specific performance where advantageous under {{Governing Law & Forum}}.<br>
Cite key procedural rules (e.g., FRCP 26, 56) and any forum-specific requirements.<br>
Tone: business-oriented, assertive, and clear; use bullet lists and sub-headings for quick GC digestion.<br><br> Variable Handling<br>
The {{Variable}} fields provide case-specific facts to sharpen the roadmap. Replace each {{Variable}} with its value, remove the braces, and—if direct substitution yields awkward or sub-optimal wording—revise the surrounding text so the final roadmap is polished, coherent, and aligned with the prompt’s intent.<br><br> Diligence<br>
Append a “Lawyer Diligence Checklist” instructing the drafter to:<br>
• Confirm jurisdictional competence and conflicts.<br>
• Re-calculate statutes of limitation against {{Key Deadlines}}.<br>
• Validate damages and equitable-relief models with supporting documents.<br>
• Ensure board/GC approval of the {{Settlement Threshold}}.<br>
• Remove placeholders, confirm privilege, and proofread before distribution.<br>
